Accredited by SAAC at A+ Grade with CGPA 3.39(2021-26)

    Re-accredited by NAAC at A Grade with CGPA 3.54 second cycle (2012-17)         Third cycle Reaccreditation  IIQA submitted and approved by NAAC.      SSR submitted successfully as on 01.01.2024.

<< Back

Student Satisfaction Survey


Analysis of Student Satisfaction Survey 2022-23    

Analysis of Student Satisfaction Survey 2021-22    

Analysis of Result of Student Satisfaction Survey 2020-21

Sl.No Components Excellent Good Satisfactory Not Satisfactory
1 Teaching –learning process 161 39 23 6
2 Using e-resources by teachers 152 44 29 4
3 Mode of evaluation 53 57 80 39
4 Transparency in evaluation 142 51 31 5
5 Feedback from teachers 104 73 37 15
6 Tutor-ward system 99 94 35 1
7 Teacher pupil relationship 86 78 60 5
8 Academic innovative programmes 83 87 43 16
9 Library resources 89 46 73 21
10 Access to library resources 93 85 40 11
11 ICT resources 105 100 19 5
12 Physical education facilities 89 115 19 6
13 Co-curricular activities 63 73 87 6
14 Counselling programmes 54 76 62 37
15 Extension activities 188 34 5 2
16 Placement cell 87 46 67 29
17 Scholarship schemes (Edu support) 45 121 54 9
18 Infrastructural facilities 123 82 13 11
19 Sanitation and drinking water facilities 89 102 27 11
20 Behaviour of Supporting staff 111 88 24 6

        Student satisfaction survey questionnaire was administered on a sample of 229 students consisting of B.Ed 1st year, B.Ed 2nd year, M.Ed 1st year and M.Ed 2nd year students. The questionnaire was developed by giving due consideration to various dimensions viz., teaching- learning process, use of ICT by teachers, library facilities, mode of evaluation, teacher-pupil relationship, mentoring of teachers, extension activities etc. The students were asked to give their response regarding the above said dimensions of the college in a four-point scale. The options were given as Excellent, Good, Satisfactory and Not satisfactory.

        Analysis of the result shows that the percent of students who rated the components as excellent in nature are Extension activities (82.09%), teaching-learning process (70.30%), Using e-resources by teachers (66.37), Transparency in Evaluation (62.00%), and Infrastructural facilities (53.71%). They are followed by Behaviour of supporting staff.

        More than 50% of students opined scholarship schemes (edu support) physical education facilities are good. Overall analysis of results shows that students are satisfied with the present functioning of the college. However students proposed suggestions for improvement of mode of evaluation, counselling programmes and placement cell.